Blockchain technology could dramatically improve the transparency and security of collaboration in BIM, including the tracking of onsite deliveries, a report from Arup has revealed.
The 72-page study on the distributed ledger technology behind the cryptocurrency Bitcoin, authored by computer scientists Christopher Kinnaird and Matthias Geipel and based on a two-day industry workshop at Arup’s offices in Berlin, concludes that Blockchain will have a “major impact” on the built environment, similar to that of the World Wide Web.
The fact that Blockchain is a “trust less” proof mechanism, under which all transactions on a network are immutable and transparent, could have major benefits for BIM, which itself aims to encourage trust, collaboration, and accountability in the supply chain.
According to the report’s authors, Blockchains could permanently record changes to BIM models when they are shared with external collaborators or clients, effectively time-stamping data so it cannot be changed or tampered with.
This could become particularly relevant with the roll out of Level 3 BIM, which proposes that all parties work together on a single, shared model, to create deeper levels of collaboration.
The report says: “Increasing trust amongst project collaborators would go a long way towards reducing corruption and inefficiencies caused by contractual disputes.”
Blockchain has the ability to indelibly link digital components in 3D models to their physical counterparts on site. Real-life components fitted with internet-connected microchips could be securely tracked on the Blockchain, from the manufacturer’s warehouse to their final location in a scheme.
This approach could ensure installed components precisely match the number of objects in the BIM model, in the process reducing waste and carbon emissions associated with the overproduction of parts and materials, says the report.
Using a Blockchain for product tracking would make the data transparently available to all parties in the supply chain, unlike existing methods using RFID tags, where data is often controlled by a single company.
BIM projects currently share models via a Common Data Environment (CDE), a central cloud-based repository where all construction project information is uploaded and stored and accessible by authorised project parties.
The fact that CDEs are centralised raises security issues and vulnerability to hacking, especially problematic on sensitive projects related to areas such as the military, prisons, or government buildings.
A Blockchain/cloud storage hybrid could provide a decentralised form of CDE more resistant to abuse. The report provides the example of US-based company Storj34, which offers a state-of-the-art platform for decentralised, end-to-end encrypted cloud storage. The system shreds data into small pieces called “shards” and stores them in a global, decentralised network of computers.
The report states: “The technology makes the platform faster, cheaper, more secure, and more readily available than centralised counterparts.”
The authors envision a future scenario in which as-built BIM models are able to display real-time data transmitted by IoT devices in a building, giving a powerful overall picture of operation to help drive improvements to efficiency.
Related articles
- Blockchain and construction: The how, why and when
- The legal frontier: Blockchain and smart contracts
- Neil Thompson: Is this construction’s payment utopia?
They claim Blockchain could provide the platform to securely connect thousands of IoT devices from different manufacturers into a single eco-system. “The Internet of Things needs a Ledger of Things in the form of a Blockchain, to provide the level of security required. Bitcoin has proved its worth, securing actual money, and has never been hacked, making the technology the obvious choice to secure IoT devices and networks,” the report says.
Blockchain was relatively unheard of until the recent rise of Bitcoin, which is based on the software platform. It is method of recording transactions, whether assets, agreements or contracts, across a peer-to-peer network of computers. Data is stored as “blocks”, bound cryptographically together into a “chain”. This digital ledger cannot be altered, only added to, and anyone on the network can access the latest version at any time.
The implications of the technology for construction are far-reaching, potentially enabling trustless smart contracts that automatically pay out when certain criteria are met, or even creating a market for construction information.
Neil Thompson, CEO of industry think tank dotBuiltEnvironment, and former head of digital research and innovation at Balfour Beatty, told BIM+: “The coverage of construction’s poor productivity is extensive. Technology such as distributed ledgers will open up information bottlenecks that plague our business models and provide an opportunity to build a market for construction data and information flows.”
Read Arup’s Blockchain report here
Image: Albund/Dreamstime.com
Technology such as distributed ledgers will open up information bottlenecks that plague our business models and provide an opportunity to build a market for construction data and information flows.– Neil Thompson, dotBuiltEnvironment
Comments
Comments are closed.
Blockchain is said to be energy intensive. Is this just when mining crypocurrency or is it inherent?
Hi Richard, blockchains are energy intensive yes, particularly Bitcoin. For Bitcoin, the currency units, called bitcoins (lower case ‘b’) are built into the protocol and are used as the monetary incentive for people to provide security for the Bitcoin protocol. Bitcoin uses a huge amount of energy, which gives it a huge amount of security. Without security a blockchain could be hacked, and a critical property of the system – immutability – would be reversed, which would make a blockchain pointless, as trust in it would be removed. Bitcoin has enormous security, hence its status as the number one blockchain in the world.
There are diffierent ways of reaching consensus (ensuring trust) on a blockchain. bitcoin uses Proof of Work. Other consensus machanisms such as Proof of Stake use much less energy. Also there are now developments of tangles rather than linear blocks which again reduce energy use futher by making the consensus use less energy. Not all blockchians are equal and bitcoin is a simple one on a global scale. Blockchains specifically for construction use will no doubt be much less broad use better blockchain technologies and be sustainable in their energy use.
Whilst Blockchain has significant advantages to avoid tampering; time-stamping changes, etc, was the impact on parties rights/obligations also considered in coming to views? E.g. termination rights and standards of reasonable skill and care? I considered some of these in my BIM+ article but wasn’t sure if the authors had considered this as well in coming to views?
I also think that the technology makes the platform faster, cheaper, more secure, and more readily available than centralised counterparts but without security a blockchain could be hacked, and a critical property of the system – immutability – would be reversed, which would make a blockchain pointless, as trust in it would be removed.